Nick Ross: It’s Not Child Porn, It’s Child Rape, And It Shouldn’t Be Appealing To Your “Curiousity”.

“We’re all inquisitive. I had never seen, until I started working on Crimewatch, child pornography… I think if someone came to me and said: ‘Would you like to see what all the fuss is about?’, I’m sorry, I probably would say yes.”

- Nick Ross, as cited in The Telegraph; June 2013

Every once in a while, someone opens their mouth and utters something so preposterous that I think I’ve woken up in some alternate reality. Today’s reality being that proposed by Nick Ross… One in which the rape of children is acceptable, and curiousity is an acceptable justification for viewing the aforementioned rapes. But this isn’t an alternate reality. It’s rape culture at full swing.

Child porn is child sexual abuse; the rape of children filmed and distributed to men who wish to rape children. Allowing Child Rape to thrive under the guise of “porn” allows the continued and furthered rape of children; a spiralling vortex. The producers care not why the rapes they film is being viewed; they care only that it’s being viewed.

 

3 thoughts on “Nick Ross: It’s Not Child Porn, It’s Child Rape, And It Shouldn’t Be Appealing To Your “Curiousity”.

  1. People should be more careful what they let in their heads, as well. Looking at child porn would be like letting a sociopath loose in your brain. I made the mistake once of reading a comment thread about blog moderation that included a few brief descriptions of what had to be removed, in this department. This stuff has a strong “cannot unsee” factor.

    • This. ^
      I was searching online for something once (amusing videos) and the description of what was obviously a child rape video disturbed me to tears for months. I could not get it out of my head and it was horrific. That was just the description.

  2. The primary reason why men film themselves and/or other males subjecting female and male children to sadistic male sexual violence is because these males are not only providing what men want to see and enjoy but also the males making and distributing these films are making huge profits. Give the male customers what they want and make huge profits is the ethos.

    I wonder if Nick Ross is also ‘curious’ about viewing images of males subjecting other males to sexual violence? I doubt it because this would mean condoning male on male sexual violence but male on female sexual violence particularly when it is males subjecting female children to sadistic sexual violence, then miraculously it becomes ‘male curiosity’ not male voyeurism or seeking to attain a sexual thrill by viewing what another male(s) are committing against a female child.

    Ross obviously has no empathy whatsoever with that group who are female children because they, like adult women aren’t human unlike males. It is overwhelmingly female children which men are sexually preying on and recording their sexual crimes for other mens’ sexual entertainment and sexual pleasure. But claiming it is ‘children’ as usual hides which sex is being preyed on by these male sexual predators.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s